Showing posts with label trust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trust. Show all posts

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

SEX & ABUSE BY CATHOLIC CLERGY

When I first started hearing about the sexual abuse scandal within Roman Catholic community I hoped  that it might present a perfect opportunity for the religious institution to address this secretive and universal issue out of the dark into God’s healing light’.  What a disappointed it has turned out to be and unfortunately still is. 

So what are the obstacles that the Church still needs to overcome?  Only an independent expert who understands the workings of the Roman Catholic institution could answer that question.  Such an expert is A.W. Sipe a much respected &  recognized Certified Clinical Mental Health Counselor who earlier spent 18 years as a Benedictine monk and priest. He was trained specifically to deal with the mental health problems of Roman Catholic Priests. 

Richard Sipe’s treatise  ‘Sex & Abuse by Catholic Clergy - Past, Present & future offers a window of hope for the Church and its victims that must not be ignored. 
Should Pope Francis adopt its insight, recommendations and vision the church may finally begin the long process of restoring a broken trust. 
  
I am greatly indebted and blessed to receive Richard Sipe’s permission to reproduce the above mentioned article, in full as follows: 

SEX & ABUSE BY CATHOLIC CLERGY

THE PAST, PRESENT & FUTURE

Plenary Session July 27, 2013

by A.W. SIPE

PAST: Putting sexual abuse in perspective.

 Sexual abuse of minors is not a recent phenomenon; the reality of clergy sexual activity has existed, as long as there have been priests and bishops.

  Church documents from the earliest centuries record the ideal of religious celibacy and its violations. (Cf. Doyle, Sipe & Wall 2006)
 
There is an element of basic asceticism in the practice of religious celibacy—the imitation of Jesus in having nothing: not a place “to lay his head”; poverty by choice; and forsaking all-family relationships in order to be like Jesus. Treating others as Jesus did was the object of the discipline. This ideal was found especially in the earliest monks of the desert.
 
But the other side of the coin is the corruption of the ideal. In our time, publicity about abuse has refocused our knowledge of the frequency of sexual violations by clergy and the horrendous and long lasting damage done to victims.

Purity was thought to be the source of clerical power.

Sexual abuse of minors does not stand alone within clerical culture. It is a symptom—and always has been—of a corrupt system of  double lives and duplicity that reaches from local parishes to the Vatican; it destroys the myth of clerical purity. The whole idea that clergy practice celibacy has imploded.

Celibate practice of clerics (even the appearance of it) gave early Christians considerable power. The early institution attempted to “bottle” this element of power as early as the 4th  Century. (Cf. Council of Elvira 309 C.E.) That earliest council record dealt explicitly with many sexual aberrations of the clergy. By the way, records of the Desert Fathers also include accounts of their sexual struggles including some accounts of violations of minors by “holy” men.

The institution wrestled for centuries to control its clergy and its property. This process of consolidating power—political, religious and temporal—was furthered by three medieval church manoeuvres:

1.) In 1049 C.E. St. Peter Damian wrote to Pope Leo IX and decried the prevalence of sexual abuse by clergy that he called “criminal vice” and said it was epidemic. (Letter 31) Even then he encouraged the pope to have zero tolerance and have offending priests reduced to the lay state. The pope was more tolerant and thought that was too stringent and said steps should be taken only if the behavior was persistent.

2.) Mandating in 1139 C.E. (1074) that all men ordained to the Roman priesthood had to make a prior promise of “perfect and perpetual chastity that involved celibacy, (non marriage). The rule was never very successful. Deprived of a chance to marry a majority of the clergy continued to have sexual companions.  [Even in the 1960s Jesuit sociologist Joseph Fichter estimated that 30% of priests in Germany were living intimately with women.] Although statistics are hard to come by sophisticated estimates from scholars around the world do not support a vigorous practice of celibacy, from cardinals to parish priests.

3.) In 1215 C.E. The IV Lateran Council proclaimed that everyone had to confess his/her mortal sins to a priest in the private and personal sacrament of penance at least once a year. Every sexual thought word desire and action constituted a mortal sin according to church teaching. We were all taught this in grade school.

Control by guilt and shame forms powerful and destructive shackles for priests and people. The chasm between the law imposed by Vatican decree and the practice of the clergy renders the teaching unbelievable. Essentially the priest is touted as another Christ (Cf. statement from IV Lateran) ... 

”Confession is the only ordinary way to receive the forgiveness of God for serious (mortal) sins, which if unforgiven, condemn a person to Hell. The Church teaches that Catholic priests have been given the authority by God to exercise the forgiveness of sins here on earth and it is in God's name by which the person confessing is forgiven. In theological terms, the priest acts in persona Christi and receives from the Church the power of jurisdiction over the penitent.”

The reason I point out these dates is to show how the church tried to expand its control over human sexuality in priests and people, at the same time it countenanced corruption and constructed structures that were dangerous under the guise of pastoral care.

Personal confession was and is a precarious site for domination and potential sexual abuse of the vulnerable. I wish that I had kept a record of the number of cases in which confession was the occasion for a violating cleric to target his victim.

PRESENT: Abuse knows no social, economic, ethnic or religious boundaries. You are one important voice among many suffering to be heard and healed; crying not only for your own torturous experiences but to support and protect children and the vulnerable to prevent them from the trauma you know only too well.

 The work that abuse survivors, their supporters, lawyers, and press do is tremendously valuable beyond the boundaries of the Catholic Church.

Your witness is now taken seriously. The clergy victim/survivors movement contributes to the understanding of the dynamics of minor abuse in every other cultural system from the family to colleges to the military and beyond the U.S. This makes you valuable.

You are real. You are telling the forbidden truth. Sexual abuse and cover-up is central to clerical culture and its inherent narcissism. The future cannot sustain a culture that effectively: hates women, imposes impossible and irrational sexual standards extols itself as unerring.
Sex is the core problematic issue for religion in our time. The sexual agenda that trips up the church was defined by Wm. Shea already in 1986: "family life, divorce & remarriage, premarital & Sex is the core problematic issue for religion in our time. The sexual agenda that trips up the church was defined by Wm. Shea already in 1986: "family life, divorce & remarriage, premarital & extra marital sex, birth control, abortion, , homosexuality (same-sex marriage), masturbation, women in ministry  (& their ordination to the priesthood) & the male monopoly on power."

This morass requires not a simple tweak, but a Copernican shift to address it. The basis on which the institution of the church builds its sexual is false. We must be part of the solution.

FUTURE. What is a vision for the future? Pope Francis has already said that "Ecclesiastical Narcissism" is one of the fundamental sources of the current corruption in the church.

He said that four days before his election as pope in an address to the cardinals. He is correct in identifying it as the Church’s fundamental illness. Certainly narcissism—self-interest—is at the root of abuse of the vulnerable and the pattern and practice of covering up violations to preserve image and money.

Certainly ecclesiastical agencies and power have not been proactive but strongly resistant to coming to grips with the crisis of clerical abuse. Every action they have taken has been reactive and largely continues in every possible way.
 
We can divorce ourselves from the institutional church all we want, but we cannot shake our own narcissism so easily. We need to support honest and reform anywhere we find it.

 AU Bishop Geoffrey Robinson’s voice is worth hearing and his call for a Council is brave and prophetic. Rare in the hierarchy.

The Capuchins of Milwaukee have been unique and bold in their efforts to review the records of all their personnel.

Our own integrity is our primary concern and responsibility. But integrity does exist even in the midst of corruption. Seek, find, and support the reformation of an institution that is sexually and financially distorted. Truth will out.

SPIRITUALITY BEYOND TRAUMA
 The long-term adverse effects of early trauma are physical/medical, psychological and spiritual. (cf. ACE Study-adverse childhood events) As you know those effects can be dire.

Sexual trauma or betrayal by a clergy person often leaves deep scars that sometimes necessarily involve the rejection of the structure of any church and hierarchy. (23.9 % of Americans raised as Roman Catholic no longer claim this as their faith. One in five Americans claim “none” as their religious preference. Cf Pew Forum on Religion.)

No one can fault anyone for rejecting Catholicism.  Co-lateral victims—family, friends, advocates and many Roman Catholic lawyers—have testified: “I can no longer believe in the Catholic Church.” 

The moral credibility of the institution has been so deeply compromised that it is empty. An institution that cannot tell the truth about itself has nothing to say.

Individuals of integrity exist (they are not generally the hierarchy of the Church).
But the need for non-clerical spirituality continues and can be found.

We can exist without a church, without rules and without dogmas.

We cannot exist without spirituality. One of the great leaders of the 20th  Century said: “We must find some spiritual basis for living, else we die.” (Bill W)

This discussion will explore ways of healing and fulfilment that go beyond institutions and clerical control.

STEPS TO A SPIRITUALITY

  •    We need powers beyond ourselves. Awareness that we are not spiritually self-sufficient is essential to a spiritual life. 
  •     It takes daily attention in mindfulness or meditation.    
  •     Honesty is necessary for any spirituality.        
  •     Empathy, gratitude and forgiveness are also required. 
  •    A system or group of like-minded people may be helpful. The 12 steps demonstrated by AA is one of the most profound spiritual programs ever devised.         
  •    Spirituality is beyond rules and dogmas. It is an internal process that will demonstrate itself to others on the outside. St. Augustine in his confessions articulates the core of his personal spirituality: It is an internal relationship that is not institutionally confined: 

     Late have I loved you, Beauty ever ancient, ever new, late have I loved you! You were within, but I was outside, and it was there that I searched for you. In my unloveliness I plunged into the lovely things that you created. You were with me, but I was not with you. Created things kept me from you; yet if they had not been in you they would have not been at all. You called, you shouted, and you broke through my deafness. You flashed, you shone, and you dispelled my blindness. You breathed your fragrance on me; I drew in breath and now I pant for you. I have tasted you, now I hunger and thirst for more. You touched me, and I burned for your peace. (St. Augustine, Confessions)
 Richard Sipe's complete professional profile and his many insightful articles can be found on-line here or at http://www.awrsipe.com/


Monday, 24 May 2010

Who do you trust?



The National Catholic Reporter announced this week (May 18/2010) "A Catholic nun, who was a member of a Phoenix Catholic hospital's ethics committee, was excommunicated and reassigned last week for her role in allowing an abortion to take place at the hospital, according to the Phoenix diocese. The surgery was considered necessary to save the life of a critically ill patient [mother of four].


The surgery took place at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center in Phoenix. The decision, involving Sister of Mercy Margaret McBride, physicians and the patient, drew a sharp rebuke from Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted, head of the Phoenix diocese. He said abortion is not permissible under any circumstances."


The article brought an overwhelming number of responses (pro and con) from readers who supported or took issue with Bishop Olmstead as well as official church teaching on abortion.


Catholics have not learned (indeed have not been taught) to depend on a direct relationship with their Creator. Perhaps a new sacrament needs to be introduced, similar to a Rite of Passage that finally severs our umbilical cord from the religious institution - we graduate! Catholics as adults need to take responsibility for their own spiritual development including all moral and ethical decisions and responsibilities. Catholics and indeed other Christian religious institutions need to defer to the Holy Spirit that exists within each human being. Does scripture not support this claim: "But the Advocate,the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you everything, and remind you of all that I have said to you." (John 14:26)


The role of the church is to help and assist us in letting go and listen to what our heart is telling us. As adults we must accept that we either trust in the church or we trust in God – but we cannot serve two masters. This is the dilemma we now find ourselves into with regard to many of the issues within the church. We have simply failed to accept responsibility for our own faith development – out of fear we have simply abrogated our faith to someone else. Religion fails whenever it sees itself as the necessary intermediate to God.


Franciscan priest, Richard Rohr has suggested that "a mature adult relationship with God is not possible in the beginning because we fear and avoid intimacy. We settle, instead, for tribal customs, laws and occupations as our identity. Membership in the group will become a gateway to, but often a substitute for personal encounter and inner experience" Interestingly, Fr. Rohr refers to 'non-groupthink' as Universalism and states "the only thing more dangerous than the individual ego is the group ego". Church dogma and doctrine can be helpful but eventually need to point to the greater authority – which can only be found in our hearts. Don't blame your church for something you yourself need to take responsibility!


Many Catholics see official church teachings as the final word on many of the issues facing the world today. These same individuals believe that to be a 'good Catholic' means to accept these teachings without question and without any private or personal discernment- and the need to interpret these teachings against the greater Gospel values.


Stop bickering about who is right and who is wrong. Who is in and who is out. Let us begin by trusting the God within - as I'm sure Sr. Margaret McBride and her patient did make this very private and difficult decision. Grant them and yourself the peace that Jesus confers on them.



Friday, 16 April 2010

Trust, Freedom and Maturity


In July 2006 the following article appeared in Online Catholics, an independent Australian e journal under the heading 'Trust! Freedom! Maturity!



Where do they exist in the Australian Church?


The model of Church being fostered within Australia has been brought into sharp focus with the decision by the Archbishop of Melbourne to withdraw his approval for social psychologist, Fr Diarmuid O'Murchu MSC, to conduct two lecture series in a Catholic institution early next year.


"It is a matter of trust," the Christian Brothers' St Patrick's Province leader, Br Peter Dowling cfc, said when speaking with Online Catholics this week. While he would not be drawn on whether or not he thought Archbishop Denis Hart's reaction was over-kill, he did express wonder at the level of trust being displayed and the degree of freedom with which people where encouraged to develop their faith.


Br Dowling confirmed that Archbishop Hart had withdrawn his approval for Fr O'Murchu to give two summer courses in the Archdiocese of Melbourne, in January 2007. The arrangements - which had included the Archbishop's approval - had been made at the end of 2005. The Christian Brothers and those associated with the visit were bitterly disappointed by the new decision.


The workshops were to be given at the Christian Brothers-owned Edmund Rice Centre "Amberley", Lower Plenty, near Melbourne. Br Dowling said he believed he had taken the correct and polite action by asking Archbishop Hart for his recognition of Fr O'Murchu's visit.


The withdrawal followed the Archbishop's receipt of information published recently in L'Osservatore Romano that Fr O'Murchu's 1995 book, Reframing Religious Life: An Expanded Vision of the Future had been the subject of a critical note from the Doctrinal Commission of the Bishops' Conference of Spain. Although the note was written more than three years ago, it only recently had been translated into English. While the MSCs Superior General is seeking clarification of the situation, there has been no statement from the CDF critical of Fr O'Murchu's views. Br Dowling said he wondered at the timing.


More perturbing, though, was the level of trust not being placed in those who wished to participate in the Melbourne seminars, he said.


On learning of the Archbishop's concerns, the Christian Brothers' Leadership Team made a strong representation that the courses should go ahead. Among the reasons put to Archbishop Hart were that the people who would be involved were well educated and mature in their faith and that they were attracted by ongoing faith development. No only were they enthused by new ideas, but their established insights and understandings allowed them to make choices about how they received new and stimulating information. They enjoyed the cut and thrust of learning and energizing conversations such were sure to occur during the courses.


However, in a letter of June 8, Archbishop Hart formally withdrew his approval for Fr O'Murchu to speak in the Archdiocese of Melbourne. A media spokesman for Archbishop Hart told Online Catholics on Tuesday that the Archbishop considered that "Fr O'Murchu's views on the nature and place of religious life in the Church meant his lectures would be a disservice here".


Both courses already had proved very popular. At the time "Amberley" stopped taking bookings, 60 people had confirmed with deposits for the Catching Up With Jesus course and 80 had confirmed with deposits for the Religious Life – Changing Paradigms course.


Br Dowling said he was unsure what would happen.


"Diarmuid O'Murchu is committed to coming to Australia but he won't be speaking in the Archdiocese of Melbourne under the auspices of a Catholic body."


On the "Amberley" website, the Director, Mr Andy Kuppe, said he was exploring "other options for the possibility of the courses proceeding". He has asked those interested to check the "Amberley" website for updates.


He told Online Catholics that the response to the withdrawal had been unanimously one of overwhelmingly disappointment and regret that an opportunity to engender faith life had been lost.


It is not the first time a Diarmuid O'Murchu visit to Australia has ruffled feathers.


He has visited Australia several times. On at least one occasion – when he was a keynote speaker for the National Catholic Education Conference, in Brisbane, in September 2001 – his visit drew flak from Michael Gilchrist of AD2000 who wrote in part: "However, the other two speakers' names - Morag Fraser, Editor of Eureka Street, and particularly Fr Diarmuid O'Murchu - leave one wondering about the philosophies of our leading Catholic bureaucrats… Father O'Murchu's name, while less familiar to Australian Catholics than Morag Fraser's, raises greater concerns, in the light of his publicly expressed religious views…"


However, it is the views of reviewer, Bert Monster, of Catholic New Times (June 2005) that are more likely to interest Online Catholic readers:


When three Canadian Catholic cardinals recently returned from Rome, following the election of Pope Benedict XVI, Marc Cardinal Ouellet publicly responded to the question of change in the Vatican. "If there needs to be change, it needs to be in the world, not in the doctrine."


Compare this response to the following quote from Fr Diarmuid O'Murchu in his book Quantum Theology. "Where religions have failed most dismally is in their perception and understanding of the world, which they all tend to dismiss as an inferior, ungodly, and transitory reality. This cosmology goes right back to the Agricultural Revolution, which projected the original mechanistic image that the world was an object to be conquered and controlled.


"Adopting this worldview, the religions concocted a self-inflationary, eschatological myth, whereby the world would come to nothing and the religions themselves would triumph. What was intended to be an instrument of God became a god in its own right; religion became an outrageous form of idolatry." …


If one takes the time to read O'Murchu's book one will quickly recognise that serious change in church doctrine is not only necessary but essential. Again Fr Diarmuid states: "Instead of trying to conquer and eliminate the negative, we [must] try to comprehend - not distance - and appreciate its complementary role for the positive."


… O'Murchu goes on to say that "Once we begin to understand and internalise the sacredness of life from within -- ourselves, our planet, and our universe -- then the classical academic search for an external agent may become quite irrelevant."


Is the Vatican ready for such change? (O'Murchu demands a rethink)


Br Dowling said it was the wish of the Christian Brothers to help people engage in creative and stimulating conversation as a means of sustaining and developing their faith. Their support of Fr O'Murchu's visit to "Amberley" was an expression of this.


"Now we are wondering about the model of Church we are operating in; the kind of trust it engenders and the tension between theology and magisterium," he said.


Fr Diarmuid O'Murchu, a member of the Sacred Heart Missionary Order, and a graduate of Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, is a social psychologist whose entire working life has been in social ministry. In that capacity he has worked as a couple's counsellor, in bereavement work, AIDS-HIV counselling and laterally with homeless people and refugees. As a workshop leader and group facilitator he has worked in Europe, USA, Canada, Australia, The Philippines, Thailand, India, Peru and in several African countries. His best known books include Quantum Theology (1996 - revised in 2004), Reclaiming Spirituality (1998), Evolutionary Faith (2002), Catching Up with Jesus (2005).


Editor's note: In preparing this report, Online Catholics approached Fr O'Murchu for comment. Fr O'Murchu, although based in London, is currently working in the United States and, at this stage, preferred not to comment.


This Prayer to the Holy Spirit is written by Fr O'Murchu. It and other prayers for special occasions are on his website.


Come Holy Spirit, breathe down upon our troubled world.
Shake the tired foundations of our crumbling institutions.
Break the rules that keep you out of all our sacred spaces,
and from the dust and rubble, gather up the seedlings of a new creation.
Come Holy Spirit, enflame once more the dying embers of our weariness.
Shake us out of our complacency. Whisper our names once more,
and scatter your gifts of grace with wild abandon.
Break open the prisons of our inner being,
and let your raging justice be our sign of liberty.
Come Holy Spirit and lead us to places we would rather not go.
Expand the horizons of our limited imaginations.
Awaken in our souls dangerous dreams for a new tomorrow,
and rekindle in our hearts the fire of prophetic enthusiasm.
Come Holy Spirit, whose justice outwits international conspiracy,
whose light outshines religious bigotry,
whose peace can halt our patriarchal hunger for dominance and control,
whose promise invigorates our every effort:
to create a new heaven and a new earth, now and forever. Amen.