Showing posts with label clerical culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clerical culture. Show all posts

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

Narcissists and Pope Francis

Just days before Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio was elected Pope, he criticized the Vatican culture as one of narcissism. Speaking to reporters of the popular Italian press La Repubblica Pope Francis emphasized that "Heads of the Church have often been narcissists, flattered and thrilled by their courtiers. The court is the leprosy of the papacy.”[1] 
This staggering accusation by the future Pope Francis seems to suggest that he and the Vatican might finally be prepared to address the endemic and systemic issues which until now have remained hidden behind the sexual abuse and financial scandals of the Vatican Bank (Istituto per le Opere di Religione - IOR).

For many years experts, such as Richard A.W. Sipe, have stated that the sexual abuse and cover-up is central to clerical culture and its inherent narcissism. Is it possible that Pope Francis read the article by Sipe published in March of 2013 under the heading Spirituality andthe Culture of Narcissism'.[2]  Judge for yourself.  .
At an unprecedented summit convened in Rome at the behest of Pope Francis earlier this month, a Vatican official warned the treasurers of 500 Catholic orders from around the world that their financial wealth, sometimes used for secular, commercial purposes such as running hotels and restaurants, was contrary to the teachings of the Catholic Church and imperils their religious mission. This new move by Francis, just one part of what many Catholics hope are wide-ranging financial reforms within the church, is driven by the pope’s concern that by engaging in modern economic activity, religious institutions “run the risk of losing their true identity.”  Watch the on-line documentary ‘Holy Money’ [3] presented by CBC’s ‘The Passionate Eye’ as they investigate the financial scandals rocking the Catholic Church & the efforts of Pope Francis to clean up the Vatican’s multi-billion-dollar business dealings amid accusations of money laundering, corruption, and misuse of donations here.

A year has gone by since Pope Francis took over leadership of the Roman Catholic Church.  His growing popularity and humble manner has been unmistakable.  Hardly a week goes by when 'Il Papa' does not provide the world with some example of what is means to live a simple Christian life despite the fact that he operates out of an extra-ordinary religious institution which can hardly be called simple.   
Many are now asking is this Pope is finally going to bring about the necessary changes that would restore trust in a much tainted institution?  Is this the Pope who will finally tackle the church’s most challenging issues such as contraception, divorce, women in the church, abortion, celibacy, homosexuality, and same-sex marriage?  Is this the Pope who will finally address and listen to the People of God?  Or, is this a Pope who will ultimately be forced to defer to his immediate advisers?   The latter seems more likely according to his German critics.   
The German weekly tabloid Der Spiegel in an article ‘The Pope’s Sex Problem‘’ [4] takes issue with the Synod of Bishops’ questionnaire ‘Catholic Family Values Survey’.  This hurried document, blessed by Pope Francis, which hardly saw the light of day in most parishes, will be dealt with almost exclusively by an all male and celibate jury in October of this year.  Disappointed Catholics will ultimately see this as a return to the conservative style of Pope Benedict.    
Critics derisively refer to Pope Francis's approach as "Papastroika, as if he were opening the Church like Mikhail Gorbachev opened the Soviet Union. That, as we now know, ended in chaos. But it should be noted that, unlike Gorbachev, Francis has yet to modify or eliminate a single relevant rule or regulation in his realm.
Those who have put their hopes in Pope Francis will need to realize that he is faced with some enormous challenges not the least of which have all been shrouded in centuries of secrecy and intrigue inside an established patriarchal hierarchy such as the Roman Curia that unfortunately sees itself as far above and beyond the $ 1.2 billion followers it is called to serve.  It will probably take more than just one man to make the necessary changes and before it can return the institution to the trusted place it once held. It will probably take more than one man to remove the narcissist from the papal court.              




Friday, 9 November 2012

Clericalism and its Culture


The Cardinal's Portrait 
Toby E. Rosenthal 
The Decree on the Ministry and Life of Priests from Vatican II clarified the duties of priests and their relationship with bishops and lay people, It implied that priests should foster greater involvement of laypeople in the life of the Church.  This document stood in direct opposition to the historic problem of CLERICALISM.    

The dictionary defines Clericalism as a policy of maintaining or increasing the power of a religious hierarchy.  When some clerics believe they are the untouchable representatives of the People of God endowed with the power to control and determine which person is a ‘Real Roman Catholic’, they will have failed their true calling.

The role of the Church is not to determine who is in, who is out, who is worthy and holy, or whose theology and Tradition is right or wrong.

 

Jesus meets us where we are, not where others would have us be.  When clerics feel the need to compare themselves with  those who fall short of being a ‘real catholic’ it suggests a definite lack of humility,compassion as well of an understanding where theologically informed adults are.  Even so, these clerics are themselves victims of the hierarchical system that drew them in with its appeal to their romantic pre-adolescent idealism.

This kind of outdated clericalism thrived in pre-Vatican II era and restores the high times of the hierarchical Church.  Eugene Cullen Kennedy emeritus professor of psychology warned  “Clerical redux energizes this spreading movement to reinstate that Neverland age of Catholicism when priests controlled the church, lay people knew their place, the Mass was in Latin, God was in His heaven and all was right with the world.”

  

It has been fifty years since Vatican II but there are still some obvious vestiges of clericalism that need to be addressed.

 

The quote from Eugene Cullen Kennedy noted above was taken from a two-part article which he wrote in 2011 under the general heading of ‘Set-decorator Catholicism’.  Part 1 ‘The Common traits of set-decorators’, and Part 2 ‘Clericalism thrives in a new phase of the sex abuse crisis’.

Both can be viewed in detail, courtesy The National Catholic Reporter as follows:


 


       

Both articles describe how the Roman Catholic Church came to and continues to struggle with the sex-abuse scandal and how CLERICALISM fostered the ongoing crisis.  Professor Kennedy colourfully illustrates how traditionalist clergy are like ‘set-decorators who treat their people as if they were children to be set right rather than as theologically informed adults to be nourished in their understanding of faith.’  He supports this observation with the need to respect the voices of Vatican II which promotes clergy and laity as equals.  When seen and treated as complimentary equals the Church will finally be able to honestly address the myriad of issues and challenges it faces today for a better and healthier tomorrow.  
 
Suggested reading: 'Clerical Culture - Contradiction and Transformation' (2004), Michael L, Papesh, Liturgical Press, Collegeville, MN.    

Thursday, 7 April 2011

the culture that allows sex abuse to happen

There have been numerous occasions throughout this blog that I have spoken out about the Catholic Church’s struggle with the ongoing sexual abuse crisis, as well as its growing militant attitude on abortions and other areas of human sexuality such as homosexuality, celibacy, condoms masturbation, same-sex marriage, partcularly when they are expressed in absolute terms.

Why does a religion remain so fearful about a gift from God when those sexual abuse issues are clearly threatening to destroy the very fabric of the institution?  THE TRUTH NEEDS TO BE TOLD. When will the hierarchy finally accept its duplicity in creating a culture that allowed the sexual abuse to bring so much pain and suffering in the world? THE TRUTH NEEDS TO BE TOLD. Why does the church still remain in denial? THE TRUTH NEEDS TO BE TOLD.  Considering the recent advances to help us break through a better understanding of human behaviour why does our Church still rely on theological definitions established by St. Augustine in the fourth century A.D.- especially in light of his own struggle with sexuality.  The Church continues to uphold its traditions as unchangeable and from an exclusive patriarchal point of view.  God, on the other hand moves with us through time, even though his unconditional love for humankind remains unchanged. God meets us where we are – not where others would have us be. Does the Church truly believe that God does not play a role in the discoveries in science and human understanding?  Surely, the revelations made known by individuals such as Galileo made this all too painfully clear? THE TRUTH NEEDS TO BE TOLD.
Most religions today, particularly those with a fundamentalist background, appear unable or unwilling to accept change and will quickly condemn anyone with different views. Christians do well to recall the price Jesus paid for attempting to introduce change in his community.
There are a few people who have the strength and courage to challenge our beliefs and understandings.  This week one such person spoke up at a gathering on April 4 at Marquette University Law School, Milwaukee - his name is Archbishop  Diarmuid Martin of Dublin, Ireland.  Here follows his complete address as it appears on the Archdiocese of Dublin website.  A condensed version is also  available on the National Catholic Reporters website of April 5th.      For full video of Martin's talk, visit the page on the Marquette University Web site.  The two day conference took place under the banner 'Restorative Justice Initiative' includes many speakers, including several victims of sexual abuse as well as Archbishop Martin.  
Having read and watched significant portions of this debate I am encouraged by the positive approach to this crisis which continues to impact our society at large. THE TRUTH NEEDS TO BE TOLD.

Friday, 20 August 2010

A Bishop’s Lament




Our Catholic bishops have been taught that they are the successors of the apostles and are therefore endowed with unquestionable knowledge and wisdom. Many were but a great number were not. Has anyone ever considered that the apostles would not qualify as Catholic bishops today? For example, the apostles:


  • were allowed to marry
  • continued to celebrate their Jewish heritage and traditions
  • did not speak Latin
  • never read the Bible (probably could not even read)
  • did not receive indoctrination into Catholic Tradition and way of life.
  • never recited the 'Hail Mary'.
  • would not have understood the words 'Church', 'bishop', dogma, doctrine or term 'excommunication'
  • would not have worn a crucifix
  • did not wear a mitre or silk clothing
  • lived in simple homesteads

Perhaps the only thing the apostles held in common with today's bishops is that they frequently misunderstood Jesus true message.


Now that we perhaps reached a better understanding of who our bishops are, we may begin to see how they have influenced our understanding of our Catholic Tradition as presented by Fr. Tom Doyle as follows:


The Church is a visible institution. The Church teaches as official dogma that the Church as we know it, that is, a hierarchical structure that is totally run by celibate male clerics (mostly bishops), was instituted by Jesus Himself. The Church teaches that the pope is the representative (Vicar) of Christ on earth. It teaches that Christ founded His church and left it in the control of the twelve apostles and explicitly willed that these apostles pass this power down to their successors. Consequently the official teaching is that the visible church is run by men who have been explicitly chosen by the Supreme Being. Furthermore the Church teaches that priests are fundamentally different than other humans. They are, in the words of John Paul II, uniquely configured to Christ. Catholics are taught to believe that priests are special. They represent Jesus Christ. They have very special spiritual powers. Their intercession is essential for anyone who wishes to make it to heaven in the next life.


This teaching is the foundation for the clerical culture that runs the Church. Clericalism is the belief that clerics (deacons, priests and bishops) are superior to lay persons and are rightfully entitled to deference, unquestioned respect and exemption from many of the obligations born by most lay people. This clerical world is the home of the men who make up the Church power structure. The Church teaches that this structure is the church. To be a Catholic, one must believe totally in the teachings about the nature of the church strictures and the sacredness of the Church's clerical ministers.


If all of these teachings were true, would there be a need for all of the secrecy? If these teachings were true, especially about the "Christ-like" nature of priests and bishops, would there be such widespread corruption, dishonesty and abuse found among clerics at every level?


If all of these things were true! The problem is that there is no authentic historical evidence that any of it is true. The various titles, roles and offices attributed to popes, bishops and priests are not products of divine revelation but of human invention, often as a response and reaction to serious external threats to the power and wealth of the clerical aristocracy. For example, and it's a good example, Papal Infallibility was literally invented by Pope Pius IX and forced through the First Vatican Council . . . for political reasons. The pope's kingdom, the Papal States, was threatened with dissolution by the Italian social upheaval at the time. Likewise the title "Vicar of Christ" was part of a conscious program of a medieval pope to fortify papal power. This title has had a long and complex and by no means consistent history. It was not applied to the Papacy until the 13th century when Pope Innocent III took it to enhance his overall program of actively concentrating just about all power in the Church in the papacy.


Consequently this massive institution seeks above all to preserve itself. Sexual abuse of children or anyone by members of the sacred elite is potentially disastrous for the image, credibility and hence the power of the Church. The bishops really believe that they are essential to the existence of the Church. Therefore protecting the hierarchy is essential and believed to be God's will. The popes and the bishops did not have to conspire to keep sexual abuse by clergy buried as deeply as possible. The secretive response is in the blood of the bishops. It is rooted in the fundamental urge to survive. Disruption and disintegration of the monarchical structures of the Church means the end of the system of power and control as we know it. This poses an unthinkable threat to the clergy and to the clerical world. The threat is personal because this world, this monarchical institution, this magical theological support system is the past, present and future of the bishops. It is their source of identity. To change or destroy it is a threat to the very being of the clerics who feed off of it.


Readers are invited to read Fr. Doyle's entire text at http://www.richardsipe.com/Doyle/2010/2010-07-25.htm


More than twenty five years ago, the Rev. Thomas Doyle warned the nation's Roman Catholic bishops about the church's looming sexual abuse nightmare. Since then, he has become a hero to the victims, speaking out on their behalf and helping them in legal cases in recent years. In doing so, Father Doyle also became a thorn in the side of the church hierarchy.For more on Fr. Doyle please read: http://www.snapnetwork.org/news/otherstates/doyle_loses_job.htm


The Lament of a bishop: "Wherever Jesus went there was a revolution; wherever I go people serve tea!" Anthony deMello, SJ.